Software and application development has changed a lot in recent years. It used to be a field that required coding expertise. Either you, or someone you hired, would need to be able to write code in order to build something halfway functional.
Today, a new breed of solutions have made it sot that a lot more people are capable of building and launching apps. With low code and no code development platforms, all you need is a vision, and an understanding of what problem your app will solve, or how it can bring value to your target user.
There are a few key differences between low code and no code solutions, as well as distinct pros and cons of each. There’s also still the option of using professional developers, which should be factored into the conversation as well.
Read on and we’ll compare the merits of low code vs no code development platforms, and whether or not these tools are better than traditional development teams.
Want to build mobile apps without the usual investment and months of development? The fastest and most affordable way to build a mobile app is to convert your existing site into native mobile apps. With MobiLoud Canvas, you can convert any type of site into native mobile apps. All your site features work out of the box. Get a free a demo to learn how it works and if it’s a good fit for your site.
What is No Code?
No code is a movement that allows non-developers to build apps or software.
The exact way this works varies from tool to tool. No code development platforms generally feature drag and drop interfaces, with a number of pre-coded elements that the user can put together to compile their app.
For example, if the user wants to add a header section and a button, they just need to add these two elements to their blank canvas, without needing to write a single line of code. Once published, the elements work the same as if they had been written by a developer.
A no code development tool may also use a different kind of mechanism to generate a web app, mobile app, website or software tool – not just a component-based visual builder. But the idea is that it should allow the user to build and launch software without writing any code.
No Code Platform Examples
Website building platforms like Wix and Squarespace are two examples of no code software. These platforms allow non-technical people to easily build and launch websites, from basic blogs or portfolio sites, to ecommerce stores.
Today they make up over 6% of the CMS (content management system) market share – which might not sound like much, but equates to millions of live websites.
MobiLoud is an example of a no-code solution for building mobile apps. It lets anyone convert a website or web app into functional apps for Android and iOS, with zero technical expertise or coding required.
Advantages of No Code Platforms
Let’s take a look at some of the major benefits of no code platforms.
- Ease of use: just about anyone can build software with these tools, breaking down what was once a huge barrier of entry to app/software development.
- Speed: no code is not only user-friendly, it’s fast. With all the underlying code pre-written, you save a lot of time by simply dragging and dropping the components you need.
- Cost: developers aren’t cheap; you’re paying for the years of education and practice that goes into becoming a competent developer. No code builders, however, are available for a low and predictable subscription fee, which almost always works out to be more cost-effective.
Disadvantages of No Code Platforms
No code platforms have their drawbacks, as well. Here are some of the reasons to consider other options:
- Lack of flexibility: many no code solutions trade usability for flexibility. It may be easy to build something that looks decent, but customizing it outside of the template is difficult.
- Speed (for end users): with code blocks awkwardly pieced together, apps built on no code platforms often run slower, due to inefficient code bloat on the back end.
- Compatibility with legacy systems: integrating your app or software with other platforms can be difficult with no code builders, making it less of a fit for business users.
Of course, not all no code builders are the same, and these advantages and disadvantages don’t apply to every tool the same way. If you’re considering using a no code platform, think about what you’re using it for, and weigh up a few different platforms to see what might fit your job the best.
What is Low Code?
Low code is a way of building apps or software that involves pre-coded blocks or elements, similar to no code. The difference with low code is that it’s more of a midpoint between no code and manual coding.
With most low code development platforms, all the code is already there, pre-written. You’ll generally drag and drop elements you want onto a canvas. The difference between a low code platform and no code is that low code requires a basic understanding of coding, to know how to fit code blocks together correctly.
For example, setting up the backend functionality of your app or software tool in a low code development tool may be confusing for someone with zero knowledge of programming and software development. Yet you don’t need to write this code from scratch – the architecture of what you need is already there for you.
On the surface, many low code platforms look a lot like no code builders. You’ve got a blank canvas, with pre-built widgets, components and elements you can drag and drop onto your canvas.
They’re less beginner-friendly, however. There is the space to add your own code as well with low code development.
Advantages of Low Code Platforms
Low code platforms offer the following benefits:
- Flexibility: compared to no code, you can do a lot more with low code platforms. You’ve got more power at your disposal to build custom functionality, and business users may find low code platforms easier to integrate with tools they already use.
- Speed: like no code, low code is also a much quicker way to build than coding from scratch.
- Cost: it’s still a lot cheaper to build with a low code development platform, versus manual coding, due to the significantly faster process.
Disadvantages of Low Code Platforms
Here are some of the downsides of working with a low code development platform:
- Usability: low code requires at least a fundamental understanding of how coding works. This may make these tools difficult to use for beginners and non-technical people.
- Speed (vs no code): while it offers a faster time to launch than manual coding, low code takes longer than building with no code platforms. For simple jobs, you may be able to do the same thing with a no code builder in less time.
Low Code vs No Code: What’s Best?
Both low code and no code are forms of “rapid application development”. They speed up the time it takes to build apps or software tools.
It’s hard to say one style of development is better than the other, because they each have their own use cases and target users in which they excel.
For beginners, building simple web apps, single-page websites or landing pages, a no code tool may work perfectly.
No code is also great for building MVPs, even if you do have the resources for manual coding, as it allows you to go to market or test your app significantly quicker (and cheaper).
Low code solutions, on the other hand, allow greater power and flexibility, making them better for technically-minded people to build more complex apps. Low code is generally better if you have plans to scale your app past a simple MVP.
We can look at a few different use cases, and pinpoint which tools (low code or no code) are best suited for each:
Best Low Code/No Code Platforms for Landing Pages & Small Web Apps
No code systems tend to be better for things like landing pages, one-page websites, and small websites.
These projects are not overly complex, and mostly visual in nature. That makes drag and drop builders a good fit.
Bubble and Glide are two popular examples, both user-friendly and catered towards non-professional developers.
Best Low Code/No Code Platforms for Mobile Apps
MobiLoud converts any existing web-based app or website into mobile apps for Android and iOS, with zero coding or programming knowledge required. This is huge, because mobile app development is an extremely specialized area, even more so than most other areas of programming.
A no code tool that’s as simple and powerful as MobiLoud is rare. Most no code or low code mobile app builders either have limiting templates or a steep learning curve. MobiLoud has neither – as long as you’ve already built an app for the web, you can launch on mobile with zero hassle and minimal cost.
Best Low Code/No Code Platforms for MVPs
Low code and no code tools are both great for building an MVP (minimum viable product) or to test out app ideas.
Instead of dedicating the time and resources to build something that may not take off, it’s often better to use a no code builder to put together a simplified version, which shows what you want to do without getting too complex under the hood.
Bubble is a good fit if what you want to build is mostly visual. Low code solutions also fit really well here, particularly for professional developers who have the ability to build an app, but to use a rapid application development platform to come out with an MVP.
Retool and Google AppSheet are two low code examples that fit nicely for this use case.
Low Code/No Code Platforms vs Custom Development
So where does manual development fit into this? Does it still make sense to hire developers to build apps/software, or to keep developers on staff?
Manual coding still has its advantages. You have much greater flexibility and scalability when coding apps from scratch. That’s because you can customize each line of code, and build out features exactly how you want them.
With no code or low code, you’re often confined to the limitations of the templates or code blocks provided (though a lot of low code builders give you the ability to edit/add code as well).
Using developers to build your software will generally result in a better and cleaner backend as well, which will make for a smoother and faster end user experience.
The big tradeoff is in time and money. Good software developers cost a lot, and even the best take some time to complete a project. There’s also the likelihood of communication issues – you may have a clear idea in your head for what you want the project to look like, but getting the developer to understand as well is easier said than done.
|Pros of Manual Coding||Cons of Manual Coding|
Ultimately, the choice depends on the budget and resources available to you, and the complexity of your project. You may want to combine a few different methods, such as using a no code tool to build an MVP, and if that goes well, hire a developer to build the thing for real.
Summing Up: What’s the Best Way to Build Your App?
Today, there are many different options available to someone who wants to build an app.
If you’re a competent developer, or you have the means to hire developers, you can build an app from scratch. However, those who don’t – or don’t want to spend the time, money and hassle on hiring and managing developers – can opt for no code or low code tools.
No code is not going to replace developers. Instead, it makes smaller projects more accessible for non-technical folk. It also lets developers test and play around with more ideas, without dedicating significant time towards coding an app from scratch, before getting market validation or buy-in from stakeholders.
It’s a good idea to try using no code or low code platforms first, and if these tools can’t accomplish what you want to do, try moving on to custom development.
If you’re a website owner looking to launch a mobile app for your site, MobiLoud is the perfect no code tool to do it, and much better than hiring a developer to write your apps from scratch.
For simple web apps, landing pages and user interfaces, try visual design tools like Bubble or Glide.
No code tools also fit for MVPs or demoing more complex project ideas.
For more elaborate apps or software tools, manual coding may still be required. But try out low code tools, such as Retool or Google AppSheet, before committing to building it from scratch.